PARACHAT VON THE POLL!

So we are voting again

in Parachat is good that we not falling out after 15-20 min and there these voices was good,
but in LLL chat is good that you see who is online ( but me liked if it chat box was bottomside, now its as a disturbance to the whole time in front of the eyes)

AllyKass wrote:in Parachat is good that we not falling out after 15-20 min and there these voices was good,
but in LLL chat is good that you see who is online ( but me liked if it chat box was bottomside, now its as a disturbance to the whole time in front of the eyes)

Perfect!

Yes we know that it is a disturbance on the top, but it is up there only for the moment - just so that you can compare.
If we decide to keep L L L chat, then it will be moved to the bottom - as it was before

We can also, at any time, change to another chat. If they finally find out what the problem is whit these phpBB-board chats....

with the parachat is good that i can put there the sounds, if somebody log-in or somebody say something.. so i dont have to check it from time to time.. or forget it.. and then be cicked out after some minutes..
soo.. you can guess which one i choose

To me it doesn't matter which one is left. I so rarely get a chance to go into chat anyways. I will just be happy to have everyone else happy.

Juhuu, Party

I prefer LLL chat
We can see when entering if someone is there and the other one takes much more memory in the computer so it interfeers with my work ;(

That was a good point, Garina - the memory thing....
Oh this is not easy....

Who knows, maybe we end up voting many times

I think the members have spoken now....
This poll has been up long enough..
And the result is clear... not with a big margine, but still...
5 votes for Parachat and 4 votes for LLL chat.

So Parachat it is for now.
May I suggest that everyone logs in there with their (OWN) forum name....
If we have problems with strangers coming in - we must find a solution for that too - how to indentify real members....

why we cannot have some time both chat rooms?
then it will itself, which is used for that.
however, whether it is possible that the LLL chat could to delete all of its own story, if it is necessary to go to?first, it was only right to admin...

These are just one of the problems with the forum chat... It does not do what you expect.....
But yes, why not having both chats

Lets see what opinions we get!!

caysa wrote:But yes, why not having both chats

I quite like that idea!!

Quoted from above:

PARACHAT 55% [ 5 ]
L L L CHAT 44% [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 9

55% + 44% = 100% ??? :scratch:

Someone is CHEATING!!!


5:9 = 0,5555555 ~ 0,56 => 56%

Then it fits: 56% + 44% = 100%

Ricky wrote:Quoted from above:

PARACHAT 55% [ 5 ]
L L L CHAT 44% [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 9

55% + 44% = 100% ??? :scratch:

Someone is CHEATING!!!


5:9 = 0,5555555 ~ 0,56 => 56%

Then it fits: 56% + 44% = 100%

it seems that 1% for of all the opportunities
nothing mysterious, whatever you would be able to devise...

Hey.... Why did we bother to have this voting at all ?????



...........................

PARACHAT 55% [ 5 ]
L L L CHAT 44% [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 9

seems that every vote gets 11% of the total
9 x 11 = 99...........
1% goes to the hungry children???

What if we had had 10 members voting?? 110 %????

AllyKass wrote:why we cannot have some time both chat rooms?

Let it be four rather. One for me, one for you, one my cousins, and one my neighbours...

Ricky wrote:

Someone is CHEATING!!!

No, no! I did not cheat on it!

Ophiophagus wrote:

AllyKass wrote:why we cannot have some time both chat rooms?

Let it be four rather. One for me, one for you, one my cousins, and one my neighbours...

why i didnt met your cousins and neighbours in LLL forum yet
ehh, you thinking only yours familiars, but africans, they also want to chatrooms, that ask for food at you

AllyKass wrote:

Ophiophagus wrote:

AllyKass wrote:why we cannot have some time both chat rooms?

Let it be four rather. One for me, one for you, one my cousins, and one my neighbours...

why i didnt met your cousins and neighbours in LLL forum yet
ehh, you thinking only yours familiars, but africans, they also want to chatrooms, that ask for food at you

There will be need for 6 chat room in this case.

caysa wrote:PARACHAT 55% [ 5 ]
L L L CHAT 44% [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 9

seems that every vote gets 11% of the total
9 x 11 = 99...........
1% goes to the hungry children???

What if we had had 10 members voting?? 110 %????

Let us vote on it according to me, what vote one more time!

Ophiophagus wrote:

AllyKass wrote:

Ophiophagus wrote:

AllyKass wrote:why we cannot have some time both chat rooms?

Let it be four rather. One for me, one for you, one my cousins, and one my neighbours...

why i didnt met your cousins and neighbours in LLL forum yet
ehh, you thinking only yours familiars, but africans, they also want to chatrooms, that ask for food at you

There will be need for 6 chat room in this case.

only 6? oh, then all billions the others chatrooms then useless

Let us start with 2 rooms ....

Then, of course..... There is a third way to do this...
That would be MSN chat.... A lot of us has that and we do have discussions there too. The newest version of MSN also has this GROUP-chat that would allow only members to join...

So, we have possibilities

Somebody knows it, for what voted we ?

No , does it matter???? Hiihii!

caysa wrote:No , does it matter???? Hiihii!

And what happened to the democracy's basic principles? :scratch:

What is THAT????
According to those principles we SHOULD have only Parachat....

Now I could read forum members wanting even 6 chats????

What am I to do?????????????

caysa wrote:What is THAT????


Now I could read forum members wanting even 6 chats????

Does a fool do a hundred?

Ophiophagus wrote:

caysa wrote:What is THAT????


Now I could read forum members wanting even 6 chats????

Does a fool do a hundred?

Are you calling me a FOOL ?????????